January 2012

States getting the message on texting laws

Will 2011 be remembered as the year drivers got serious about putting down their phones? If the flurry of activity on distracted driving during the year’s final months is any indication, the answer is yes.

In March, Pennsylvania will become the 35th state (plus D.C.) to ban texting while driving — and the movement is little more than five years old. The swift passage of those regulations encourages advocates and has some thinking Congress can stay on the sidelines. Texting bans are generally low-hanging fruit for legislators and the public. An October AAA survey found 95 percent of respondents consider texting or emailing while driving a serious threat to personal safety and 87 percent of those polled support laws against text messaging.

Are we on information overload?

A Q&A with David Weinberger, a senior researcher at Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society.

The last two decades have completely transformed the way we know. Thanks to the rise of the Internet, information is far more accessible than ever before. It’s more connected to other pieces of information and more open to debate. Organizations — and even governmental projects like Data.gov — are putting more previously inaccessible data on the Web than people in the pre-Internet age could possibly have imagined. But this change raises another, more ominous question: Is this deluge overwhelming our brains? In his new book, “Too Big to Know,” Weinberger attempts to answer that question by looking at the ways our newly interconnected society is transforming the media, science and our everyday lives. In an accessible yet profound work, he explains that in our new universe, facts have been replaced by “networked facts” that exist largely in the context of a digital network. As a result, Weinberger believes we have entered a new golden age, one in which technology has finally caught up with humans’ endless curiosity, and one that has the potential to revolutionize a wide swath of occupations and research fields.

Mobile campaigns to be hot in 2012 presidential race

Social networks played an important role in the last U.S. presidential election, but the explosive growth in smartphone usage and the introduction of tablets since 2008 could make or break the candidates for president in 2012.

As the Republican primaries heat up, the major contenders show on their official websites a strong recognition of social networking and connecting in digital ways via desktop computers. But the GOP and President Obama's campaigns are not yet making many mobile-specific connections to supporters via smartphones or tablets, analysts noted. Some campaigns have special links on their websites for getting updates via SMS to a phone, but they don't appear to have candidate-specific downloadable mobile apps on Apple's App Store or the Android Market so far. “Smartphones and tablets are much more mainstream now, and these devices are literally driving the Occupy movement and the revolutions in the Middle East,” noted Rob Enderle, an analyst for Enderle Group. “The ways we connect to one another have changed quite a bit in the last couple of years. Candidates need a good social media campaign to win, and social media done right includes mobile, because mobile allows candidates to loop in supporters in the moment and stay in touch and respond in real time. Mobile makes social networking more important.”

Not for sale: Candidate .xxx domains

Domain names are important real estate in presidential campaigns. Candidates hope to snatch up all variations of their name before opponents looking to score points do. Adult website domains present a more intriguing situation. Domains designated .xxx(as compared with .com, .net, .org and so on) were opened up earlier this year by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) as a way to provide adult websites with their own domain and, while many actual adult companies seized on the opportunity, plenty of non-adult entities, including colleges and museums, have bought up their .xxx names as a defensive measure against others misusing them. For the current Republican field of presidential contenders, the .xxx domains that correspond with their campaign websites have already been taken by the firm that operates the registry in order to protect the GOP hopefuls. That means MittRomney.xxx, RickSantorum.xxx, RickPerry.xxx, Newt.xxx, MicheleBachmann.xxx and RonPaul2012.xxx are not for sale. [Dec 28]

Queens Libraries Speak the Mother Tongue

The best-selling biography of Steve Jobs is flying off the shelves at libraries in Queens, which is not surprising. But in many of the borough’s 62 branches, the copies being borrowed are in Korean, Chinese or Spanish.

A library branch in Astoria, responding to its own diverse readership, carries children’s books in Arabic, Bengali, Chinese, Russian, Portuguese and Gujarati, the official language of a western Indian state. And when branch librarians noticed an influx of yet another group, they acquired the story of “Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves” in Croatian. Striving to cater to the intensifying globalization of its surrounding streets, the New York neighborhood library speaks your language as never before. The surge in immigrants patronizing the Queens system has spurred its branches to offer books, DVDs and CDs in 59 languages, more than double the total a decade ago. So important has acquiring foreign-language books become to the Queens Library’s mission that Radames Suarez, who supervises the Spanish collection, travels every year to the largest Spanish book fair in the world, in Guadalajara, Mexico. The Queens Library even has a staff demographer. As with bilingual programs that teach students in their native languages as well as in English, the internationalization of neighborhood libraries has led some to question if making foreign books easily accessible impedes or hastens assimilation. Ms. Kim acknowledged that she worried that many Korean immigrants were “reading only Korean books or watching Korean TV or interacting only with Koreans.” Still, she said, in New York “we like to keep our own cultures as well.” And other librarians argue that making books available in native languages draws immigrants into a library where they will in time browse the English texts.

Libraries walk a tightrope on porn

[Commentary] Some people never realized before that libraries, originally intended as great institutions of public edification through books, could be used these days as sources for viewing porn. Others were all too aware of the issue because they had seen library computers regularly used for decidedly unlofty pursuits, even when there were children around who could easily see the screens. Librarians have insisted that they are obliged to provide Internet access to pornography as a matter of their clients' free-speech rights; limiting or prohibiting access to certain kinds of information amounts to censorship, in their eyes. The reality is more complicated, though. Despite what the librarians say, libraries already restrict access to certain kinds of print material by using their scant financial resources to purchase some books and magazines rather than others. Libraries are far more likely to have copies of the New Yorker on the periodical shelves than copies of Hustler. True, Internet access to porn sites doesn't cost a library more than access to Wikipedia, but both involve making judgments about the relative worth of some materials over others.

Verizon’s Worrisome Cable Deals

[Commentary] AT&T’s decision to drop its bid for T-Mobile is a victory for the Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission, which steadfastly opposed a deal that would have locked the wireless market into a duopoly and been bad for consumers. But the battle to defend competition in telecommunications is hardly over.

As regulators moved to block the AT&T deal, Verizon Wireless was buying big chunks of spectrum from the nation’s largest cable carriers and signing agreements with them to sell each other’s services to consumers around the country. The deals could have the positive effect of putting to use spectrum that cable companies bought at auction in 2006, and encouraging Verizon to roll out new high-tech wireless services. But the potential for these agreements to curtail competition in both wireless and wireline industries is troubling, and should be examined by the Justice Department and the FCC. Verizon’s cable deals squashed hopes that cable carriers’ purchases of wireless spectrum would lead to more competition against the dominant players, AT&T and Verizon Wireless. And it puts in doubt whether FiOS will ever be a serious competitor to cable, reducing the likelihood that video transmitted over broadband could break up cable’s regional oligopolies. Verizon’s deals suggest a future in which cable carriers will get uncontested control of high-speed broadband into the home while AT&T and Verizon will get uncontested control over wireless. For consumers with expensive wireless plans, pricey bundles of cable channels and costly, slow broadband, this does not look like good news. (Dec 24)

After Outcry, Verizon Abandons $2 Fee

Verizon Wireless bowed to a torrent of criticism and reversed a day-old plan to impose a $2 bill-paying fee that would have applied to only some customers.

The consumer vitriol, which cascaded across Twitter and onto blogs and petitions all around the Web, struck a chord with a company that was clearly not expecting it. “The company made the decision in response to customer feedback about the plan, which was designed to improve the efficiency of those transactions,” Verizon Wireless said in a statement referring to the reversal. That a company with revenue of $15 billion in the most recent quarter would have to quickly change course over such a small fee suggests something particular about its business and others like it. Similar to fee-bedeviled airline passengers with little choice on many nonstop flights, or bank customers who do not want to spend hours untangling automated payments so they can switch institutions, Verizon Wireless customers have limited options because they are locked into multiyear contracts. And they apparently did not like being told that it would cost money to pay money to the company. Verizon Wireless may also been have moved to change its mind when the Federal Communications Commission put out word Dec 30 that it thought the company’s actions merited closer scrutiny. (Dec 30)

Ruling by Justice Dept. Opens a Door on Online Gambling

The Justice Department has reversed its long-held opposition to many forms of Internet gambling, removing a big legal obstacle for states that want to sanction online gambling to help fix their budget deficits.

The legal opinion, issued by the department’s office of legal counsel in September but made public on Dec 23, came in response to requests by New York and Illinois to clarify whether the Wire Act of 1961, which prohibits wagering over telecommunications systems that cross state or national borders, prevented those states from using the Internet to sell lottery tickets to adults within their own borders. Although the opinion dealt specifically with lottery tickets, it opened the door for states to allow Internet poker and other forms of online betting that do not involve sports. Many states are interested in online gambling as a way to raise tax revenue. (Dec 24)

In New York and Elsewhere, Disputes Over Television Fees Lead to a Few Blackouts

It has become a common warning blaring on TV stations near the end of the year: this station might be blacked out come New Year’s Day. Viewers are being caught in the cross-fire as television stations argued for higher fees from cable and satellite distributors in a system called retransmission consent. Scores of distribution deals were set to expire on Saturday night. On Jan 1, however, there were almost no reports of station blackouts. As is normally the case, the warnings in public were superseded by successful negotiations in private. (Jan 1)