April 2013

House Intel leaders: Cybersecurity bill will not allow cyber snooping

Republican and Democratic leaders of the House Intelligence Committee offered assurances that legislation allowing companies to share information on cyber threats with the government would not allow the government to collect data on private customers. Consumer privacy remains a major concern related to H.R. 624, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). But in lengthy remarks on the House floor, Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI) said the bill was designed with privacy in mind. "We believe this: this bill will not work if Americans don't have confidence that it will protect your privacy and civil liberties," Chairman Rogers said. "This is not a surveillance bill," he added. "It does not allow the national security agencies, or the Department of Defense, any of our military organizations, to monitor our domestic networks. It does not allow that to happen, we would not allow that to happen."

Bill That Would Have Created Mass Media Violence Commission Defeated

An amendment was defeated in the Senate that would have created a commission to study the causes of mass violence, including media violence. The vote was 54 to 46, but 60 votes were required for passage of the amendment.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) had introduced the Public Safety and Second Amendment Rights Protection Act as an amendment to the larger bill to try and extend background checks to gun shows and online sales. But it also had a provision establishing a "a commission of non-elected experts in their fields who will study the causes of mass violence in the United States, looking at all aspects of the problem, including mental health, guns, school safety and portrayals of violence in the media. This broad approach is absolutely necessary to truly address our culture of violence." Still up for potential debate is an amendment by Sen. Rockefeller (D-WV) that would direct the Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission and Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a media violence study.

FCC Commissioner Clyburn announces Staff Change

Federal Communications Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn announced the departure of Angie Kronenberg and the appointment of Rebekah Goodheart as Acting Wireline Legal Advisor. Kronenberg has been serving as Clyburn’s Wireline Legal Advisor since December 2009 and has provided advice on a wide variety of wireline, broadband, disabilities access, and universal service matters.

Rebekah Goodheart has worked at the Commission since January 2008, most recently serving as Deputy Director of the Technology Transitions Policy Task Force and Associate Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau. She previously served as a Senior Policy Advisor for the Omnibus Broadband Initiative, developing many of the recommendations in National Broadband Plan. She also served as Assistant Division Chief in the Industry Analysis Division of the Media Bureau. Prior to joining the Commission, Rebekah served as a Trial Attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division in the Telecommunications and Media Enforcement Section, and was an associate at the law firm Wiley Rein LLP. Rebekah holds a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law, and a B.S.F.S., cum laude, from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service.

White Paper: Don't Graft Legacy Regulations on IP Voice

Applying legacy interconnection regulations to Internet voice traffic is not "needed, practical, nor efficient," according to a white paper from Analysis Mason partner Michael Kende. The paper concludes that "Internet services themselves are not just undermining the basis for traditional regulation, but also providing guidance for how network interconnection is achieved in the absence of regulation."

On big data, the Boston Marathon and civil liberties

[Commentary] For all the concerns over mobile phone logs, video footage and other data collection that could potentially be used to survail American citizens, it’s times like this that I think we see their real value. According to a Los Angeles Times article about the bomb attack at the Boston Marathon, the FBI has collected 10 terabytes that it’s sifting through in order to seek out clues about what exactly happened and who did it. Maybe I’m just a techno-optimist, but I find this very reassuring. It’s reassuring because I’ve spoken with so many smart people over the years who can do amazing things with data. Ten terabytes isn’t a huge data set by any stretch of the imagination, but it’s plenty to work with if it’s of high quality. It’s very possible there are some needles in that haystack of call logs, and I’m optimistic the analysts within the FBI — possibly with some outside help — will be able to find them.

Digital Public Library of America Opens Access to Resources

A new platform will aggregate digital resources from libraries and museums across the United States. The Digital Public Library of America will launch a new website on Thursday, April 18, and officially become an independent nonprofit with the goal of pulling together vast resources for the public.

The organization had planned a launch event at the Boston Public Library, but that event will no longer take place following the explosions near the Boston Marathon finish line on April 15. This national library platform will not host any resources, but instead provide open access to metadata about them. Once users find a resource description they like, a link will lead them to the home library's website for the full version. About 40 state digital libraries and a few regional ones already aggregate resources from local historical societies, museums and libraries, though not many people know about them. Seven of these organizations have agreed to participate in an initial pilot designed to create a network of content aggregators nationwide.

The seven state libraries include:

  • Mountain West Digital Library (Utah, Nevada and Arizona);
  • Digital Commonwealth (Massachusetts);
  • Digital Library of Georgia;
  • Kentucky Digital Library;
  • Minnesota Digital Library;
  • South Carolina Digital Library; and
  • Oregon Digital Library.

Time Spent Watching Free VOD TV Content Jumps 40%: Rentrak

The amount of time subscribers spent watching free video on demand television fare soared in 2012, according to the latest findings from measurement company Rentrak.

According to the "Rentrak State of VOD Report 2012," which reflects four years of platform analysis from Rentrak’s OnDemand Essentials Service, the total amount of time subscribers spent viewing free-on-demand TV content grew 40% in 2012 from 2011’s level. Moreover, the report found that the total number of free-on-demand TV programs watched went up 29% from the prior year. Relative to broadcast network shows, the percentage gains were even greater, as there was a 60% uptick in total time spent viewing those programs and a 47% advance in the number of those shows watched from the prior year.

Younger TV Viewers Moving Offline

Growing numbers of young TV viewers have been moving offline for some time. Now, 27% of U.S. online 18 to 24 year olds watch five or more hours per week online. Also, 29% of those 18 to 24 years olds watch between one and four hours; 17% watch under one hour, and 28%, watching no video online. Heavy users of online programming drop among older viewers, per Forrester Research. It says among 25 to 49 year olds, 12% watch five or more hours; 18% watching between one and four hours; 20% viewing under one hour; and 50% watching no video online. Older viewers, 35 to 44 year olds, only 9% watch five or more hours per week. Overall, more than 60% of young TV viewers watch some programming online, with 22% of U.S. online adults watching at least some of their video entertainment on Netflix, with 17% from TV networks’ own Web sites.

The Government Didn't Shut Down Cell Service in Boston. But With SOP 303, It Could Have.

Shortly after the horrific explosions that interrupted the Boston Marathon, the Associated Press reported that the government had shut down cellphone service in the area. That wasn't true—but it's not impossible.

"No one in Washington or in any statehouse or bunker anywhere can press a button and shut down phone service," explains Harold Feld, vice president at Public Knowledge, an advocacy group focused on communications and technology policy. But although there's no physical kill switch, there is Standard Operating Procedure 303, a secret agreement between telecommunications giants and the government that outlines "a shutdown and restoration process for use by commercial and private wireless networks during national crises," according to a government report on the subject. The government can shut down cellphone service—but it didn't do so in Boston. Because SOP 303, also known as the Emergency Wireless Protocols, is classified, the public doesn't know under which specific conditions a shutdown could occur. But in 2006, the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC), a group of major telecom company executives and government officials, issued a report that revealed some details about SOP 303. The committee's report explained that the National Coordinating Center for Telecommunications (NCC), an emergency telecom coordination body set up by President Ronald Reagan in 1984, would serve as a clearinghouse for requests to shut down wireless networks "within a localized area, such as a tunnel or bridge, and within an entire metropolitan area."

CDC to study use of mobile tech in surveys

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will pilot test the efficacy of using basic text messages via mobile phones and Web-based messages via smartphones in public health surveillance for programs such as smoking cessation, according to a notice published in the Federal Register. The pilot will compare results of the mobile phone survey with those from an older survey method, computer-assisted telephone (call center) interviewing, the CDC announcement said.