September 2013

Déjà news

Joint-services agreements allow multiple stations in the same market to pool resources. The deals vary widely from agreement to agreement, and often include only marketing or sales teams, which seems harmless enough. But many include sharing news operations.

A subcategory of joint-services agreements are called shared-services agreements, and they always involve the sharing of newsgathering resources. The resources shared can vary from news scripts and story packages, to reporters and the merger of entire newsrooms—so that communities end up with fewer local voices, less information overall, and only the illusion of choice. Outlet owners, meanwhile, can end up with more power than the spirit of Federal Communications Commission rules on media ownership consolidation would seem to warrant, as joint-services agreements are excluded from the FCC’s ownership limitations. In an address last February, Ajit Pai, a current FCC commissioner, took a strong stance against the argument that stations should count these agreements toward media ownership limits in individual markets—a decision that would likely put an end to most joint-services agreements.

“If the FCC effectively prohibits these agreements, fewer stations in small-town America will offer news programming, and they will invest less in newsgathering,” Commissioner Pai said. “And the economics suggest that there likely will be fewer television stations, period.”

Steve Waldman, a former FCC adviser supports the idea of joint-services agreements in some situations. But, he said, the lack of information about them makes it impossible to determine which agreements reflect sensible attempts at efficiency, and which are driven by cost cutting and outsourcing. “The promise of shared services agreements is that we’ll use shared services to eliminate duplicate investment, and then we’ll invest them in investigative reporting and boots on the ground,” he said. “And that isn’t what happened. It’s evolved in some cases into outsourcing the news.”  

Japanese Smartphone Manufacturer Sees an Export Market in Older Users

The Japanese electronics industry largely missed out on the smartphone revolution. Yet this summer, even as one Japanese company, NEC, exited the business, another one, Fujitsu, announced plans for a new export push. Rather than competing with dominant brands like Samsung and Apple in the mainstream smartphone market, Fujitsu is aiming at a niche — older consumers, who, the company says, are not always served adequately by products like Apple’s iPhone or the Samsung Galaxy series.

In partnership with Orange, formerly France Télécom, Fujitsu has started selling a smartphone in France that uses a technology called Raku-Raku, or “easy easy.” The Raku-Raku handset has a touch screen and provides on-the-go Internet access, but it has larger buttons and other features aimed at older people who sometimes struggle with the complexity of conventional smartphones. While aging consumers may be a niche market, they present a growing opportunity in most industrialized countries. In Japan, 39 percent of the population will be 65 or older in 2050, up from 23 percent in 2010, according to the Statistics Bureau of Japan. In France, the 65-and-older cohort will grow to 25 percent in 2050 from 17 percent in 2010, data from the United Nations show. “It’s an underserved market,” said André Malm, an analyst at Berg Insight, a research firm in Gothenberg, Sweden. As for Orange and Fujitsu, the companies say they view the partnership in France as a pilot project; if the Stylistic phone catches on, they say, it will also be offered in other European markets in which Orange operates, like Britain. “For Japanese vendors, it has been challenging to go abroad,” said Michito Kimura, an analyst at the research firm IDC, “but this technology does meet a demand.”

How Big Is Apple’s China Mobile iPhone Opportunity?

With 280 carrier partners across more than 100 countries, Apple’s addressable market for the iPhone these days has been estimated by some to encompass upward of four billion subscribers. With a reach that broad, opportunities for big market share gains aren’t as easy to come by as they once were — which is why we may soon see that long-in-the-offing deal to bring the iPhone to China Mobile.

If Apple were to ink a deal with China Mobile in the near future, the company could easily sell an additional five million iPhones in the next quarter, based on three percent penetration of the 3G subscriber base of 180 million. And as penetration increased quarter to quarter, iPhone sales would rise accordingly, so that by the time the fourth quarter of 2014 rolls around, China Mobile could be notching iPhone sales of 12.5 million units. Taken together with that year’s other three quarters, Marshall predicts that China Mobile could spike Apple’s iPhone sales by 38.7 million units in calendar 2014. With more than 700 million subscribers, China Mobile is the largest wireless carrier in the world, and, as ISI analyst Brian Marshall notes, it’s one of the few remaining carriers that can really move the needle on iPhone sales. Approximately 180 million China Mobile customers use the company’s 3G network, and Marshall figures that’s a good proxy for gauging the size of the iPhone opportunity it presents for Apple. And that opportunity is massive

Syria could be a crucial proving ground for US cyberwarriors

If President Barack Obama orders an attack against the regime of President Bashar al-Assad, it will likely include cyberattacks.

Experts say President Obama is unlikely to order the kind of stand-alone cyberattack against Syria that the United States launched against Iran’s nuclear facilities a few years ago. But digital sabotage could play a significant role in an American military strike if Congress approves an intervention. Syria’s air defenses would likely be among the first targets of any cyberattack, the experts said. US forces could trick the country’s radar system into seeing nothing as American jets passed overhead, or disrupt Syrian missile sites designed to shoot down US aircraft. American engineers also could disable Syria’s power grid remotely while the intervention was ongoing, then bring the system back online. They might take down Syrian command-and-control networks, or, in a move reminiscent of more traditional electronic warfare, jam the Syrian army’s communications or block its propaganda.

Obama to Europe: US not 'snooping' on phone calls, emails

President Barack Obama sought to reassure Europeans that the United States is not "snooping" into their phone calls and e-mails. He defended the National Security Agency's surveillance programs, insisting they are focused only on counterterrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and cybersecurity. "I can give assurances to the public in Europe and around the world that we're not going around snooping at people's emails or listening to their phone calls," President Obama told reporters at a press conference in Stockholm. "What we try to do is target very specific areas of concern."

Verizon sees few changes to US wireless business

Verizon's $130 billion deal with Vodafone is huge for both companies, although Verizon customers in the US are unlikely to see any big changes to their bills or their service.

Verizon Chairman and CEO Lowell McAdam said that the company's US wireless businesses are working well now, and that he would move slowly on any changes to its structure. "We're very bullish on the growth outlook for the US wireless marketplace," he said. In the most recent quarter, Verizon Wireless added 941,000 devices to its contract-based plans, exceeding expectations and extended a strong run. But almost all of Verizon's wireless gains were customers upgrading to higher-priced plans or adding more devices, rather than an influx of new customers. Verizon said it expects regulators to approve the deal since it already controls its US wireless business. It also needs shareholder approval. It expects the deal to close during the first quarter of next year.

Sprint Seeks Early US Airwaves Auction as Rivals Urge Delays

Sprint is pushing regulators to quickly auction airwaves for high-speed mobile data, a move rivals say may leave the third-largest US wireless carrier as the sole bidder.

Sprint told the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in August that it supports a January auction of frequencies, known as the H Block, which abut its existing airwaves and can improve its high-speed wireless broadband service. T-Mobile US and Dish Network urged the FCC to consider waiting until later in 2014, when additional frequencies can attract more bidders and money. The FCC asked for comments as it prepares the biggest sale of commercially useful frequencies since 2008 -- the year after Apple introduced the iPhone and helped ignite a surge in demand for wireless data. “It gives everybody more flexibility in their bidding strategies, which likely leads to a higher price,” said Tim Farrar, an analyst at research firm TMF Associates. The H Block could raise $1 billion if auctioned alone, compared with $1.5 billion to $2 billion if offered along with other frequencies, Farrar said.

Are These TV's Next Big Blackouts?

CBS and Time Warner Cable finally agreed on a new contract, ending a month-long blackout of the network in certain markets. But the deal isn't a fix for what's widely considered a broken TV model, meaning CBS probably won't be the last network to go dark this year as battles between content providers and cable and satellite operators intensify.

There's certainly little rest ahead for Time Warner Cable, whose deals with both Discovery Communications and Viacom expire before the end of the year. It is playing hardball in particular with Viacom -- whose networks include MTV, Nickelodeon and Comedy Central but also smaller channels like MTV Jams and Palladia. Cablevision has called out Viacom for the way it wields its portfolio, filing a lawsuit in February that claimed Viacom forced Cablevision to pay for 14 low-rated channels if Cablevision also wanted access to core networks like MTV and Nickelodeon. Refusing to carry those smaller channels would have incurred a $1 billion penalty, Cablevision alleged. Pay-TV operators are also increasingly looking for rights to stream programming to their subscribers over the web -- rights that networks may want to sell elsewhere.

Court: FCC Program Carriage Rules Don't Violate First Amendment

The US Court of Appeals has rejected cable operators' First Amendment challenge to the Federal Communication Commission's program carriage regime, but did find that the FCC’s imposition of a standstill on prices, terms and conditions of a contract for which a complainant was seeking renewal was out of bounds.

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association had argued that the standstill needed more public vetting before the FCC adopted it. Cable operators had also argued that the rules are content-based and needed to be subject to strict First Amendment scrutiny they had not gotten. The FCC had countered that the rules do not disfavor speech based on content, but instead regulates speech based on "affiliation with a cable operator," which, the FCC pointed out, are the same grounds on which the DC circuit upheld leased access. The court agreed with the FCC on that score.

New Sites Aim to Help Pick Best Ed-Tech Tools

Educators struggling to choose the best technology products face a mind-boggling array of decisions, a challenge that is spawning a growing number of education technology product-review sites.

Such sites -- sometimes compared to Consumer Reports, Angie's List, or CNET in how they use ratings and recommendations to evaluate educational technology -- are now operating or are launching soon, with educators themselves assigning the grades. The effectiveness of such review sites is still a big question mark. But their existence comes at a critical time, as schools face a multitude of decisions about laptops, tablets, smartphones, digital curricula, video, apps, and other technologies.