September 2014

Google Satellite Employee Greg Wyler Leaves Company

Apparently, a key employee leading Google's efforts to beam Internet access from satellites has left the company and is now working closely with Space Exploration Technologies and its founder Elon Musk.

Greg Wyler had joined Google in 2013 as part of a $1 billion-plus Google effort to offer Internet access to unwired parts of the globe. It is unclear what Wyler's departure means for that project. Wyler took with him the rights to certain radio spectrum that could be used to provide Internet access. Wyler apparently formed a new venture, WorldVu Satellites Ltd., that designs satellite systems and controls the rights to that spectrum. Brian Holz and David Bettinger, who joined Google with Wyler from O3b Networks Ltd., also have left Google. O3b is a private satellite company founded by Wyler.

Comcast bets on hyper-local by reviving EveryBlock

Comcast is reviving the once-future of local online news, announcing on its corporate blog that it has expanded its relaunch of the news and social site EveryBlock to include its home city of Philadelphia, at the same time the company is digging into its potential nation-wide merger with Time Warner Cable.

"EveryBlock," writes Comcast's director of local media development Paul Wright, "is a personalized news feed that allows users to stay connected with neighbors, interact and share what's happening on their block, and discover great content and information from around their area. The hyper-local site aggregates news, reviews, events, local blogs and other web content, civic data (like crime reports and 311 requests), as well as user-generated questions and comments, and packages it into a personalized feed for users."

FCC Proposes Per-Sub DBS Fee

The Federal Communications Commission adopted several proposals from a June Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on changes to how it collects regulatory fees from pay-TV providers, broadcasters and others.

In addition to raising the minimum fee liability threshold, the FCC also eliminated several regulatory categories -- broadcast auxiliaries, satellite construction permits -- all effective in 2015. The FCC put off in a further notice the issue of whether to establish a direct broadcast satellite regulatory fee category.

Sunlight: 99 percent of network neutrality comments wanted stronger FCC rules

The Sunlight Foundation wrapped up its weeks-long study of the more than 1 million initial comments filed to the Federal Communications Commission on network neutrality.

The top-line results are unsurprising, with less than 1 percent of 800,000 commenters calling for Internet providers to be regulated more lightly. That's consistent with a major push by consumer advocates to convince FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to adopt stronger rules on Internet service providers. The study comes with some important caveats. Out of the 1.1 million comments the FCC said it received, Sunlight was only able to process 800,000 because some comments were mailed in to the agency and weren't available online when Sunlight began looking at the comments. Others came bundled together in packs that Sunlight had to break apart to make sense of.

Despite the incomplete analysis, the research is the most credible one we've seen to date and shows an overwhelming bias toward stronger regulation. About two-thirds of the studied comments called for reclassifying broadband providers under Title II of the Communications Act — a move that would allow the FCC to regulate ISPs more heavily but would likely provoke a strong political backlash.

'Game of Gigs' Analysis Cites Cable's Defensive Response Toward Top Speeds

Gig.U singles out "Google Fiber" as "the prime force in driving" the increasing gig announcements from competitive providers.

"Google's entry into the next generation broadband market is the single greatest input driving a number of competitive response," says a report from Gig.U. "If Google were to withdraw or even just indicate that it was not proceeding further, incumbents and others would likely slow down their own efforts and progress would likely stall." Gig.U’s Blair Levin interprets some recent gigabit efforts by cable and telecom giants as representing "a positive change in their perceptions of both the opportunity and the threat" by community groups and rival companies, such as Google. "A year ago ISPs such as Cox and Time Warner Cable were antagonistic toward gigabit upgrades," the report says. "They responded to gigabit initiatives with comments suggesting that upgrades were too expensive, and further, that they knew best what their customers wanted." "Now they are singing a different tune," says the report, pulling its punch by saying that this is not a criticism. "Rather they deserve credit for recognizing how the landscape has changed," especially "the "poplar demand for faster speeds." The report notes that Time Warner Cable plans to deploy "TWC Maxx" service in seven markets in 2015, delivering speeds up to six times faster than current facilities. "Though TWC won't be offering gigabit speeds, the significantly faster speeds will be a drastic improvement over current offerings," the report says.

Gig.U was formed to help break that logjam. The results so far have been impressive, but the game is far from over. "We think the years 2015 and 2016 will prove decisive in achieving our goal," the report concludes, "but only if we, and others, spend this year with our foot on the accelerator."

‘Secret law is a threat to democracy,’ Dems warn in letter to President Obama

Four House Democrats have teamed up with privacy advocates to protest a “secret law” that they say authorizes spying on some Americans' e-mails and online messages.

The lawmakers, organizations and former administration officials told the White House in a recent letter that the Obama Administration should declassify “all current and future legal opinions” or legal interpretations that permit spying under a controversial executive order. They also urged President Barack Obama to ban “disproportionate or unnecessary” collection of people’s messages, Internet chats and other communications. “Secret law is a threat to democracy,” Reps. John Conyers (D-MI), Alan Grayson (D-FL), Rush Holt (D-NJ) and Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) wrote in a letter joined by groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Frontier Foundation and Access. “We will continue to work to build support for further privacy protections for all users in surveillance activities conducted under [Executive Order] 12333,” they added, referring to a contested order from the Reagan administration amended by former President George W. Bush. The letter was also sent to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, a small government watchdog panel.

FCC wins disability rate challenge

A federal appeals court judge is siding with the Federal Communications Commission over a challenge to some of the ways that it pays companies for helping deaf people talk on the phone.

A three-judge panel on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled against Sorenson Communications in the case decided over its service that allows people who are deaf or have hearing disabilities to call others via video, similar to popular services like Skype or Apple’s FaceTime. The deaf person communicates with an American Sign Language interpreter who speaks with the person on the other end of the line. Like all providers of the service, Sorenson Communications is paid through an FCC fund at a pre-established rate. That rate is supposed to cover the cost of the video relay service, but has actually been helping to pad the profits of companies like Sorenson. As a result, the FCC has been trying to lower the rate, and most recently did so in 2013. The communications company said the new rates were too low to keep funding services it operated under the old method, but Judge Douglas Ginsburg, writing on behalf of the court, tossed out that argument.

Chairman Walden Announces Hearing Continuing Oversight of the Federal Communications Commission

House Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden (R-OR) announced that the subcommittee will meet on Wednesday, September 17, 2014, to discuss the Federal Communications Commission’s management and spending. The hearing will continue the committee’s oversight of the FCC and follows the committee’s requests for documents regarding the commission’s workload and backlog. FCC Managing Director Jon Wilkins and Inspector General David Hunt will testify before the committee.

Remarks by FCC Commissioner O'Rielly at the LinkIDAHO 2014 Broadband Summit

The current broadband rollout and availability has been an incredible success story. Nevertheless the [Federal Communications Commission] seems intent on changing course. Rather than upend years of progress, I have six recommendations to promote investment and innovation within the successful framework that exists today.

  1. Stop Any Net Neutrality Rules
  2. Remove Unnecessary Burdens
  3. Complete the Reforms Already In the Works
  4. Don’t Change Program Requirements Midstream
  5. Don’t Duplicate Broadband Infrastructure
  6. Establish and Stay Within a Clear Budget for Universal Service

AT&T: Cities should never offer Internet service where ISPs already do or might later

With the Federal Communications Commission considering whether state laws banning municipal broadband should be invalidated, AT&T says that municipalities should simply never create their own broadband networks unless there’s virtually no chance that private Internet service providers will ever offer service to their residents.

“GONs [government-owned networks] should not be utilized where the private sector already is providing broadband or can be expected to do so in a reasonable timeframe,” AT&T said in a filing with the FCC. “Although many GONs have failed, or at least failed to live up to expectations, GONs can nonetheless discourage private sector investment because of understandable concerns by private sector entities of a non-level playing field. And any policy that risks diminishing private sector investment would be short-sighted and unwise.” AT&T isn't opposed to government handouts, though, as long as they are flowing to the private sector. Community broadband networks “should not receive any preferential tax treatment,” AT&T argued. Only private companies should be given special treatment, the company said. “Indeed, any tax incentives or exemptions should be provided, if at all, to private sector firms to induce them to expand broadband deployment to unserved areas,” AT&T wrote.