January 2015

Apple reports largest profit in history

Apple surpassed even the most bullish Wall Street expectations for its holiday quarter with an improbable trifecta: selling more iPhones at higher prices -- and earning more on each sale.

The company said it sold 74.5 million iPhones in the quarter, 46% above a year earlier, while lifting the average selling price of the devices by $50 from the prior year. The total equates to more than 34,000 phones an hour, around the clock. Consumers snapped up Apple’s two new larger-display phones, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, which made their debut in September, after years in which Apple ceded the large smartphone market to rivals. Revenue increased 30% to $74.6 billion from $57.6 billion. Apple posted net of $18.0 billion for its fiscal first quarter ended Dec. 27, 2014, up 38% from $13.1 billion in the same period a year earlier. That is more than 435 of the companies in the S&P 500 index each made in total profits since 2009, according to S&P Capital IQ.

AT&T Secured More Lucrative Long-term Wireless Contracts

AT&T added 854,000 of the wireless industry’s core customers in the last three months of 2014, as profits and customer retention showed signs of strain from the heightened competition among the nation’s biggest carriers. But the Financial Times reports that AT&T lost more than 100,000 of its most lucrative mobile phone customers in the final three months of 2014, as the second-largest US wireless carrier fell victim to a bruising industry price war being waged by its smaller rivals.

The rate at which customers left its network, known in the industry as “churn”, hit 1.22 per cent, or its highest level in two years. The fourth quarter, usually the busiest and least profitable for wireless companies because of the costs related to phone upgrades, included strong demand for Apple’s latest iPhone at a time when the carrier used promotional deals to battle with rivals for customers. With little room for growth in the US, where the market is saturated, AT&T is spreading into new businesses through the acquisition of satellite television provider DirecTV and deals to acquire two wireless companies in Mexico. AT&T expects all the deals to close by mid-2015. The company is also coming to the end of two years of intense investment to upgrade its wireless and wired networks. AT&T reiterated that it would spend around $18 billion in 2015, down from about $21 billion in 2014. Amid all the strategic moves, the company’s net income was hit by an already disclosed $7.9 billion charge for pension-related costs. For the three months ended Dec. 31, AT&T reported a loss of $3.98 billion, compared with a profit of $6.91 billion a year earlier. Revenue rose 3.8% to $34.4 billion.

Fears grow for freedom of expression in South Korea

As political turmoil gripped South Korea in 1948, with a Soviet-backed regime to the north plotting infiltration and invasion, the authoritarian leader Syngman Rhee pushed through a law giving himself sweeping powers to punish dissent and subversive activity. Nearly 70 years and much political change later, the law not only remains in place but is set to become more draconian. New government proposals would make it easier for prosecutors to dissolve organisations accused of “anti-state” activities such as voicing support for the North. South Korea is cracking down on dissent as governments across Asia are taking similar steps, to the alarm of activists, democrats and many citizens.

Google: Strong net neutrality rules won’t hurt the future rollout of Google Fiber

After announcing a major expansion of its high-speed Internet service, Google said it will continue to pour money into new broadband networks even if federal regulators adopt strong network neutrality rules designed to thwart Internet providers that may want to speed up or slow down certain Web sites over others. That's a long way of saying Google is taking the opposite stance of many in the broadband industry, such as Comcast, Verizon and others, who argue that aggressive rules would slow the industry's investments in better Internet infrastructure -- and by extension, their ability to offer better service to you and me.

Remarks by NTIA Assistant Secretary Strickling on DNS Transition

This year promises to be another critical year for Internet governance, centering in part on efforts to complete the privatization of the Internet domain name system, currently managed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.

I have consistently answered that we are looking for a plan that preserves ICANN as a multistakeholder organization outside of government control which the community develops through an open and transparent multistakeholder process and that has the broad support of stakeholders. In addition, the proposal must maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the domain name system. The proposal must meet the needs and expectations of the global customers and partners of the IANA services. And finally, it must maintain the openness of the Internet. I want to reiterate again that there is no hard and fast deadline for this transition. September 2015 has been a target date because that is when the base period of our contract with ICANN expires. It is up to the community to determine a timeline that works best for stakeholders as they develop a proposal that meets NTIA’s conditions, but also works.

Republicans shine spotlight on Internet management system

Sens Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Roy Blunt (R-MO) are hoping to shine a spotlight on the Commerce Department's moves to hand off oversight of the system governing Internet addresses by introducing a resolution that would designate the week of Feb 8 as Internet Governance Awareness Week.

The resolution would coincide with a meeting in Singapore on the topic, and outlines a series of principles for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers to follow as it organizes the multi-stakeholder process to hand over the reins permanently of oversight and management of the Internet domain name system.

How can the government stop the Internet of perceived risks?

[Commentary] The interesting discussion inside the Federal Trade Commission's report on the Internet of Things is how data has become a catalyst for innovation.

Inside the report we see hints of the next shift, the one where your next innovation isn’t built around how fast you can code or iterate, but on your data streams and the quality and defensibility of your algorithms. And in that world, the threat of legislation around data privacy and even some of the more-reasonable consumer opt-ins or disclosure suggestions around user data found in the report are an existential threat. Many of the requests for dumping user data quickly or trying to limit the way data could be used was met with worries about how that would stymie innovation. Even trying to tell consumers how it could be used, so companies could offer an opt-in opportunity, was impossible because companies don’t even know what they want to do with it yet. Companies want data -- all of it -- because they understand that having access to it could be a catalyst for future products and business. The hard part will be convincing the industry to make the Internet of Things a great experience, perhaps by teaching it to see the public as human beings rather than just consumers.

Rep Jared Polis wants US intelligence to monitor Sen Marco Rubio 24/7

Rep Jared Polis (D-CO) is calling for the US intelligence community to begin 24-hour monitoring of Sen Marco Rubio (R-FL) in response to a recent op-ed Sen Rubio wrote endorsing the permanent extension of post 9/11 intelligence gathering tools, presumably including controversial domestic data collection programs revealed by former government contractor Edward Snowden.

"If Sen Rubio believes that millions of innocent Americans should be subject to intrusive and unconstitutional government surveillance, surely he would have no objections to the government monitoring his own actions and conversations,” Rep Polis said. "Sen Rubio is asking for American technology companies to ‘cooperate with authorities,’ so I believe he will have no objection to authorities being given access to his electronic correspondence and metadata. Maybe after his 2016 strategy documents are accidentally caught up in a government data grab, he’ll rethink the use of mass surveillance,” he continued.

Appointment of Members to the Downloadable Security Technology Advisory Committee

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler announced the members of the Downloadable Security Technology Advisory Committee.

DSTAC will discuss (i) the scope of the report that it will deliver to the FCC, (ii) the ultimate goals of interested parties with respect to navigation device conditional access and content security, (iii) recommended working groups and the tasks for which they will be responsible, and (iv) any other topics related to the DSTAC’s work that may arise.

Congress: You can’t fool the public on net neutrality

[Commentary] It didn't take much to get Fight for the Future members angry. After all, members of Congress take some of the most money in campaign contributions from "Big Cable" companies, and these same members held hearings that were transparently designed to undermine the public will on network neutrality.

We told our members the hearings were happening, and put a livestream on our website alongside a tool that let people call their reps with one click. We added a feature where, after a person talks to 10 members of Congress, they get connected to a Fight for the Future staff member, so we could personally thank them. After talking to all of those supporters, I am absolutely positive that we will win this fight for net neutrality. The people I talked to had literally nothing in common with each other except that they all cared fervently about net neutrality, and were willing to do pretty much anything to defend it. Realizing that was the exact moment when President Lincoln’s quote came into my mind. “You can’t fool all of the people all of the time.” The Internet as a platform for free speech and exchange of ideas has made this adage truer than ever before in history; and that’s exactly what we’re fighting to defend.

[Evan Greer is the Campaign Director of digital rights nonprofit Fight for the Future]