February 2016

The urgent need for Silicon Valley to lead a smart and civil conversation on inequality

[Commentary] Income equality is not going to improve; technology is about to make things much worse. It will, over the next decade, begin to disrupt almost every industry, wipe out millions of jobs, and make the rich even richer. Even though everyone will be able to live better and healthier lives and benefit from the technology advances, the widening gap will cause greater resentment and create a larger cauldron of dissent. This is something we need to be prepared for. So far, the Valley’s moguls have largely been in denial that technology will wipe out millions of jobs and increase inequity. They prefer to believe they are building a utopia that doesn’t have a dark side.

But one of the most influential people in Silicon Valley, Paul Graham, broke ranks and wrote an essay about the role of start-ups in income inequality. It created a firestorm and started an important debate. We need to have open discussions about the good and bad of technology and soften its negative impact. We need to discuss safety nets, the retraining of workers, and the concept of a universal basic income for everyone. We need a nationwide dialogue on how we can distribute the new prosperity we are creating. Equally importantly, we need to create equity and fairness in our legal, justice, and economic systems—which are badly lacking. Otherwise we will see even more anger, and unrest nationwide.

[Wadhwa is a fellow at Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University, director of research at Center for Entrepreneurship and Research Commercialization at Duke, and distinguished fellow at Singularity University]

Sen Sanders Out-Raises Clinton in Silicon Valley

Sen Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is seeing a surge of financial support from companies in Silicon Valley and is now out-raising presidential rival Hillary Clinton at the largest tech firms there, a boost that likely helped the Vermont senator’s fundraising outpace Clinton’s in January. In the last three months of 2015, Sen Sanders drew nearly $105,000 from employees at the five largest technology companies in Silicon Valley. That was about four times the amount he raised from those firms in the first quarter of his campaign, and almost $10,000 more than Clinton raised over the same period from employees at the same firms, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.

The former secretary of state’s fundraising among Silicon Valley firms, meanwhile, has stayed steady over the course of the year, suggesting that Mr. Sanders is turning out donors there who were not previously making political contributions.

Why it matters if Airbnb paid Beyoncé for that Facebook plug

Airbnb appears to have won a big fan: Beyoncé. Queen Bey even gave the vacation rental site a boost on Facebook the day after performing at the Super Bowl. "It was a Super weekend Airbnb," she wrote, tagging the tech company alongside a picture of her presumably enjoying what was reported to be $10,000 a night rental in Los Altos Hills (CA) -- a five bedroom contemporary villa complete with a pool, spa, outdoor fireplace, 60 tree orchard, and (!) chickens. But one big question remains: Was Beyoncé's enthusiasm bought and paid for?

Companies will shell out big bucks to get celebrities to hawk their products online -- and an endorsement from Bey to the more than 64 million fans who "Like" her on Facebook would be a bargain at almost any price. But neither Beyoncé's PR reps nor Airbnb responded to multiple inquiries asking if she was compensated for the post. And if she was paid for the mention, or got something like a free rental in exchange, it may put Beyoncé and Airbnb on the wrong side of the Federal Trade Commission.