BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2012
Low Power radio and Privacy highlight today’s agenda http://benton.org/calendar/2012-11-30/
WIRELESS/SPECTRUM
Third Interim Progress Report on the Ten-Year Spectrum Plan and Timetable
House Communications Subcommittee Discusses Receivers’ Role to Limit Interference in a Spectrum Scarce World
Unsubscribe Confirmation Texts Get FCC OK - public notice
FCC Extends Comment Period for Incentive Auctions Proceeding - public notice [links to web]
Up next for the FCC: Space communications [links to web]
Voice calls over 4G LTE networks are battery killers [links to web]
INTERNET/BROADBAND
Verizon: Free Speech at Heart of Network Neutrality Case
Sen Durbin sees defense bill as vehicle for online sales tax
The rest of the Internet is too slow for Google Fiber [links to web]
GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
Senate panel votes to require warrant for police e-mail searches
ELECTIONS AND MEDIA
Hey, I Need to Talk to You About This Brilliant Obama E-mail Scheme
OWNERSHIP
Sen Cantwell Calls for Public Vote On Ownership
MMTC: FCC Should Seek More Comment Before Ownership Vote [links to web]
US, Europe to Huddle on Google Probes
LABOR
Asian workers now dominate Silicon Valley tech jobs
CONTENT
Solving the Challenge of Online Captioning [links to web]
Now It’s a Race: ComScore Adds Up Web, Mobile and App Eyeballs for the First Time [links to web]
Twitter in legal spat over data clampdown [links to web]
HEALTH
This App Uses Cell Phone Data To Track How You’re Feeling [links to web]
TELECOM
FCC Eliminates Regulation of International Calling Charges - public notice [links to web]
TELEVISION
King of TV for Now, CBS Girds for Digital Battle [links to web]
POLICYMAKERS
New York Taps NIST's Sunder for Post-Sandy Review of Critical Systems and Services - press release [links to web]
The American Press Institute board of trustees appoints Tom Rosenstiel executive director - press release [links to web]
STORIES FROM ABROAD
Syria Has Disappeared From the Internet
Syria’s Throwing of the Internet Kill Switch Raises Lots of Questions
Official Syrian Web Sites Hosted in US
ITU Adopts Resolution Inviting Members to Keep Hands off Internet
US ambassador: Russia's proposals for telecom treaty are 'shocking'
EU Says Telecoms Treaty Should Not Expand Web Regulation
Keep the net beyond the autocrats’ reach - op-ed [links to web]
India to Revise Enforcement of Internet Law [links to web]
Leveson’s stick and carrot for wary press
PM fails to back Leveson on UK press law
Newspapers return fire on Leveson [links to web]
Towards a grand bargain with the press - op-ed [links to web]
Press Freedom at Risk - editorial
The British Press Already Has a Regulator: The British Press - op-ed [links to web]
Virgin wins contract to provide free Wi-Fi [links to web]
US, Europe to Huddle on Google Probes
WIRELESS/SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM PLAN UPDATE
[SOURCE: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, AUTHOR: Sec Rebecca Blank, Lawrence Strickling]
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) submits this Progress Report as called for by the Presidential Memorandum issued on June 28, 2010, directing the Secretary of Commerce, working through NTIA and in collaboration with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), to make available 500 megahertz of federal and nonfederal spectrum by 2020 for expanded wireless broadband use. To date, NTIA, in accordance with advice received from the Policy and Plans Steering Group (PPSG), has identified 210 megahertz of federal spectrum for potential reallocation, and continues to move forward to quickly transition the specified spectrum bands. NTIA and the FCC have also kicked off the implementation of the key spectrum-related provisions of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, enacted in February 2012. The key accomplishments for this reporting period include the following:
NTIA and the FCC commenced actions to implement key spectrum provisions from the Tax Relief Act;
NTIA published a report in March 2012 on the 1755-1850 MHz band, which recommended making 95 megahertz of prime spectrum available for commercial broadband use and identified the associated challenges to address;
NTIA launched collaborative efforts between industry and government stakeholders to assess and recommend practical frameworks for the development of relocation, transition, and sharing arrangements and plans for 110 megahertz of federal spectrum in the 1695-1710 MHz and the 1755-1850 MHz bands;
NTIA initiated studies on the potential use of up to 195 megahertz by unlicensed
broadband devices in the 5350-5470 MHz band and the 5850-5925 MHz band;
The FCC commenced rulemaking proceedings to facilitate the transition of broadcasting and satellite spectrum bands to terrestrial mobile broadband services;
The United States Government successfully advocated for an agenda item for the 2015 World Radiocommunication Conference to consider allocation of additional spectrum to the mobile service on a primary basis for International Mobile Telecommunications and related regulatory provisions, to facilitate the development of terrestrial mobile broadband applications; and
NTIA and the PPSG continued reevaluation and reprioritization of other spectrum bands that offer the greatest opportunities for unleashing the innovative potential of wireless broadband and using the wireless spectrum more creatively and efficiently.
benton.org/node/140378 | National Telecommunications and Information Administration
Recommend this Headline
back to top
RECEIVERS AND SPECTRUM
[SOURCE: House of Representatives Commerce Committee]
The House Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, chaired by Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR), held a hearing exploring “The Role of Receivers in a Spectrum Scarce World.” The subcommittee focused on how best to promote innovation and maximize spectrum efficiency in the constantly evolving wireless communications marketplace.
Ronald Repasi, Deputy Chief of the Federal Communications Commission’s Office of Engineering and Technology, explained that the FCC has largely focused on transmitters as it has worked to limit interference and maximize efficiency with previously allocated spectrum. However, given the rapidly evolving wireless technologies, he said, “Receiver performance is becoming increasingly important as a limiting factor as we move to repurpose spectrum and pack more services closer together on the spectrum chart. The continuing challenge for the Commission will be to maximize the amount of usable spectrum for cost effective deployment of new communication services while sufficiently protecting incumbent receivers.”
Brian Markwalter, Senior Vice President of Research and Standards at the Consumer Electronics Association, discussed the role device manufacturers play ensuring that their products are void of interference issues and reliable for those that use them. He said, “Equipment manufacturers and mobile providers have a strong self-interest in developing and deploying devices that are resistant to forms of interference and devices that create as little interference as possible. The limited amount of available spectrum combined with the high cost of spectrum and the dynamic interference environment faced by the industry incentivizes the development of efficient and robust receivers.”
Pierre de Vries, a Senior Adjunct Fellow at the University of Colorado at Boulder, highlighted the need for parties to work together to find the common ground that neighboring spectrum users can tolerate. He testified, “The policy challenge is to ensure that services that are affected by each other’s signals have the appropriate information and incentives to find the appropriate levels of interference and mitigation. The old strategy, which was to avoid any possibility of interference, is increasingly problematic as we need to crunch ever more services ever more closely together. A better approach is to maximize the value of wireless services, taking into account the costs and benefits of interference, rather than simply minimizing interference as an end in itself.” While he advocates for the adoption of “harm claim thresholds,” de Vries argues that those thresholds are best determined by stakeholders rather than government agencies.
benton.org/node/140372 | House of Representatives Commerce Committee | Broadcasting&Cable
Recommend this Headline
back to top
CONFIRMATION TEXTS GET FCC OK
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: ]
The Federal Communications Commission granted a request by SoundBite Communications, Inc. (SoundBite) and confirm that sending a one-time text message confirming a consumer’s request that no further text messages be sent does not violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) or the FCC’s rules as long as the confirmation text has the specific characteristics described in the petition. The ruling will allow organizations that send text messages to consumers from whom they have obtained prior express consent to continue the practice of sending a final, one-time text to confirm receipt of a consumer’s opt-out request—a widespread practice among businesses, non-profit organizations, and governmental entities, which many parties in this proceeding, including a consumer group, assert is good consumer policy. The FCC emphasized that the ruling applies only when the sender of text messages has obtained prior express consent, as required by the TCPA and Commission rules, from the consumer to be sent text messages using an automatic telephone dialing system or “autodialer.” The ruling ensures that wireless consumers will continue to benefit from the TCPA’s protection against unwanted autodialed texts, while giving them certainty that their opt-out requests are being successfully processed.
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, a huge “The Big Lebowski” fan, said, “Today’s common-sense order ends the legal lacuna and the courtroom arbitrage it has inspired. Hopefully, by making clear that the Act does not prohibit confirmation texts, we will end the litigation that has punished some companies for doing the right thing, as well as the threat of litigation that has deterred others from adopting a sound marketing practice. And consumers want confirmation texts: They want the assurance that that there will be no further intrusions on their privacy. In short, today’s order is a win for consumers and for innovative companies alike.”
benton.org/node/140375 | Federal Communications Commission | FCC Commissioner Pai
Recommend this Headline
back to top
INTERNET/BROADBAND
VERIZON: FREE SPEECH AT HEART OF NET NEUTRALITY CASE
[SOURCE: National Journal, AUTHOR: Josh Smith]
Verizon’s court challenge to the Federal Communications Commission’s network neutrality rules has sparked a battle between two views of the First Amendment. As part of its lawsuit over the rules, which govern how Internet companies can restrict or block content on their networks, Verizon says that the regulations infringe on its First Amendment rights. “Just as a newspaper is entitled to decide which content to publish and where, broadband providers may feature some content over others,” Verizon and MetroPCS attorneys argued in a joint brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. But that assertion was disputed at a Capitol Hill briefing organized by top Democrats on the House Commerce Committee. Calling Verizon’s argument “troubling,” House Commerce ranking member Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Reps. Ed Markey (D-MA), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Doris Matsui (D-CA), and Mike Doyle (D-PA) organized the meeting to brief staffers on the “startling constitutional arguments being made in the D.C. Circuit and how the role of Congress in enacting communications policy could be radically undermined.” “This idea that the Internet can be closed, or blocked, or managed by private parties is the exact opposite of America’s foreign policy,” said former Federal Communications Commission Chairman Reed Hundt, pointing to the Obama administration's Internet freedom advocacy. “The Internet is a common medium.” Hundt dismissed Verizon’s view that it is somehow similar to a newspaper. “Verizon is like paper, not a newspaper,” he said.
benton.org/node/140331 | National Journal
Recommend this Headline
back to top
DURBIN SEES PATH FOR ONLINE SALES TAX BILL
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Bernie Becker]
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) is pushing to attach his online sales tax measure to the defense authorization bill the chamber is currently debating, Durbin’s office said. The Senate has been voting on amendments to the defense authorization bill for much of Nov 29. But with votes expected to go deep into the night, it remains to be seen whether the online sales tax measure will get a vote. Sen Durbin has been working with Sens. Mike Enzi (R-WY) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN) on an online sales tax bill for much of this Congress. The three senators tried to attach the measure to small business legislation this summer, but it never received a vote. On the House side, Reps. Steve Womack (R-AR), Jackie Speier (D-CA), John Conyers (D-MI) and Peter Welch (D-VT) are also working to pass an online sales tax measure.
benton.org/node/140383 | Hill, The
Recommend this Headline
back to top
GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE APPROVES ECPA UPDATE
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Brendan Sasso]
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted overwhelmingly to require police to obtain a warrant before reading people's e-mails, Facebook messages and other forms of electronic communication. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the author of the bill and chairman of the committee, said he does not expect the full Senate to vote on the measure, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), until next year. He called the committee vote an important step forward and said he plans to negotiate with the House to guide the bill to passage during the next Congress. All of the committee members voted for the legislation except for Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), who was not present but recorded a "no" vote. The committee attached the e-mail privacy legislation to H.R. 2471, a House bill that loosens video privacy requirements. That bill, which cleared the House last year, would allow users of Facebook and other social media sites to opt in to automatically share which online videos they have watched.
benton.org/node/140325 | Hill, The | Sen Leahy
Recommend this Headline
back to top
ELECTIONS AND MEDIA
OBAMA E-MAIL CAMPAIGN
[SOURCE: The Atlantic, AUTHOR: Alexis Madrigal]
The Obama campaign raised $690 million online. The majority of it came from the fundraising emails that peppered inboxes for the last two years. They employed a team of 20 writers and a sophisticated analytics system to measure and improve their effectiveness. Now, they're starting to spill the secrets they learned during the campaign. And as revealed in a new report from Joshua Green, there was a high-powered viral media outfit lurking in Chicago. The lessons from the campaign aren't just a recipe for making money, but for winning eyeballs in the brutal deathmatch to grab your attention on the Internet. What we can learn is how the Obama campaign fine-tuned its content for maximum Internet impact, i.e., how it channeled its inner BuzzFeed.
benton.org/node/140368 | Atlantic, The | Bloomberg
Recommend this Headline
back to top
OWNERSHIP
CANTWELL LETTER TO FCC
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) has asked Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski to vote his media ownership order at its next public meeting -- scheduled for Dec. 12 -- though she suggests that would be a blow to diversity of ownership and viewpoints. Actually, she would prefer the FCC not adopt the draft proposal, which she says would diminish diversity of "local views, viewpoints and opinions." But, in a letter to Chairman Genachowski, Sen Cantwell suggested that was preferable to the commissioners voting on it in private. It was circulated to the other commissioners for a vote and not scheduled on either the November or December agenda. She opined that there were no public meetings or hearings on the proposed rules after the chairman issued its rulemaking proposal in December 2011. That proposal would loosen the newspaper-TV crossownership rules, lift limits on newspaper-radio crossownership and allow radio-TV crossownership, while counting some joint sales agreements toward local ownership caps that are being left in place. Sen Cantwell was particularly concerned about the FCC's suggestion that lifting the limits on radio-TV and radio-newspaper ownership was ending "outdated prohibitions." Instead, she said, they support diversity, competition and localism. She wants the public meeting so the commissioners will have to publicly defend their decision. "The American public needs to hear directly from you and the other commissioners on this critical matter."
benton.org/node/140386 | Broadcasting&Cable
Recommend this Headline
back to top
LABOR
ASIAN WORKERS DOMINATE SILICON VALLEY
[SOURCE: San Jose Mercury News, AUTHOR: Dan Nakaso]
Asian-Americans make up half of the Bay Area's technology workforce, and their double-digit employment gains came from jobs lost among white tech workers, according to Census Bureau data. The dramatic shift in the changing composition of the high-tech workforce represents a new generation of homegrown and imported workers drilled in science, technology, engineering and math studies. But the shift in workplace demographics -- at least among tech companies -- fails to reflect the gains of California's Hispanic and Latino population, which lost ground in tech jobs along with African-Americans. "It's the new world -- a world in which whites are not the majority," said Jan English-Lueck, associate dean of the college of social sciences at San Jose State University, who is also co-founder of the Silicon Valley Cultures Project. "Other people are being displaced." The percentage of Asian tech workers grew from 39 percent in 2000 to just more than 50 percent in 2010 in Santa Clara, San Mateo, Alameda, Contra Costa and San Francisco counties combined, according to Census Bureau statistics. At the same time, white workers saw their more than 50 percent majority of tech jobs in 2000 fall to nearly 41 percent.
benton.org/node/140408 | San Jose Mercury News
Recommend this Headline
back to top
STORIES FROM ABROAD
SYRIA DISAPPEARS FROM INTERNET
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Arik Hesseldahl]
Syria, the Middle Eastern country in the middle of an especially bloody civil war, disappeared from the Internet. The research firm Renesys, which keeps track of the status and health of the technical underpinnings of the Internet around the world, just reported that at 10:26 UTC this morning — which, by my watch, would have been 5:26 am ET — effectively all of Syria’s international Internet connectivity shut down. More technically, what happened was that within the global routing table, all 84 blocks of IP addresses assigned to Syria have gone unreachable. That means that Internet traffic destined for that country is going undelivered, and also that traffic coming from within it cannot get out to the world.
benton.org/node/140335 | Wall Street Journal
Recommend this Headline
back to top
SYRIA’S BLACKOUT
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Arik Hesseldahl]
At least five networks operating outside Syria, but still operating within Syrian-registered IP address spaces, are still working, and are apparently controlled by India’s Tata Communications. These same networks, Renesys says, have some servers running on them that were implicated in an attempt to deliver Trojans and other malware to Syrian activists. Cloudflare has also been monitoring the situation in Syria and has made a few interesting observations. First, pretty much all Internet access in the country is funneled through one point: The state-run, state-controlled Syrian Telecommunications Establishment. The companies that provide this capacity running into the country are PCCW and Turk Telekom as the primary providers, with Telecom Italia and Tata providing additional capacity. There are, Cloudflare notes, four physical cables that bring Internet connectivity into Syria. Three of them are undersea cables that land in the coastal city of Tartus. A fourth comes in from Turkey to the north. Cloudflare’s Matt Prince says it’s unlikely that the cables were physically cut. You might ask – why now? Clearly, the Syrian regime is under more pressure than ever before. Previously, it tended to view the country’s Internet as a tool to not only get its own word out to the wider world, but also to try and spy on and monitor the activities of the rebels and activists. With fighting intensifying in and around the capital and the commercial city of Aleppo, the decision to throw the kill switch might indicate a decision to try to disrupt enemy communications. Or it might mask a seriously aggressive military action that it wants to keep as secret as possible.
benton.org/node/140382 | Wall Street Journal
Recommend this Headline
back to top
SYRIAN WEB SITES
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Amy Chozick]
Even as Syrians lost access to the Internet on Nov 29, people outside the country could still browse the Syrian government’s many Web sites for much of the day because they are hosted in foreign countries, including the United States. By nightfall, after being contacted by The New York Times, several host companies said they were taking down those sites. They and similar companies had been identified in reports published by Citizen Lab, a research laboratory that monitors North American Web service providers that host Syrian Web sites. An executive order by President Obama prohibits American companies from providing Web hosting and other services to Syria without obtaining a license from the Treasury Department.
benton.org/node/140397 | New York Times
Recommend this Headline
back to top
ITU RESOLUTION
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
In its continuing effort to convince nervous members like the U.S. that the upcoming telecom treaty conference in Dubai (it starts Dec. 3) will not be a referendum on greater government control of the Internet, the International Telecommunication Union announced it had adopted a resolution to that effect... sort of. ITU announced that its members had adopted a resolution "inviting" members to "refrain from taking any unilateral and/or discriminatory actions that could impede another Member State from accessing public Internet sites and using resources." "Just days away from the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12), the adoption of this Resolution underlines ITU's commitment to a free and inclusive information society," said Hamadoun Touré, secretary general of the ITU. "This should send a strong message to the international community about accusations that ITU's membership wishes to restrict the freedom of speech. Clearly the opposite is true. It is in this spirit -- fostering an Internet whose benefits are open to all -- that I would like to head into WCIT-12."
benton.org/node/140385 | Broadcasting&Cable | ITU
Recommend this Headline
back to top
ITU PROPOSALS
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Jennifer Martinez]
The proposals Russia submitted for a global telecommunications treaty being negotiated could allow governments to review content flowing over Internet networks and open the door for online censorship, said U.S. Ambassador Terry Kramer. Kramer called Russia's submission of treaty language "the most shocking" out of all the proposals submitted by countries participating in the treaty conference. He said Russia's proposal aims to give governments more control over the management of the Internet and how Web traffic is routed, which he argued runs counter to the focus of the treaty conference. Kramer said Russia's proposal would let governments "review [Web] content and say that's purely a national matter," raising concerns over online censorship. He said the proposal would also disrupt the current governance structure of the Internet. Kramer the U.S. also takes issue with proposals from some African and Arab nations that would force Web companies — such as Google's YouTube or Netflix — to pay network operators to deliver their data-heavy Web content abroad.
benton.org/node/140333 | Hill, The
Recommend this Headline
back to top
EU AND THE ITU
[SOURCE: Bloomberg, AUTHOR: Aoife White]
The European Union will oppose attempts to increase regulation of the Internet at a United Nations conference in Dubai next month as some countries call for tighter rules on phone operators and Web service providers. “Some non-EU countries have tabled proposals for a significant increase in the scope of the treaty and the regulatory burden on operators, including Internet service providers,” according to the political body representing 27 European nations. “The EU believes that there is no justification for such proposals and is concerned about the potentially negative impact on innovation and costs.”
benton.org/node/140401 | Bloomberg
Recommend this Headline
back to top
LEVENSON REPORT
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Ben Fenton, Robert Budden]
The final words of Lord Justice Leveson’s summary of his proposals for reforming and regulating an “outrageous” press that has lost sight of the responsibilities that go with its rights and freedoms are an appeal to the public and to politicians. Lord Justice Leveson tells the public that he has done what “I believe is fair and right for everyone.” He tells politicians that he expects them to treat his recommendations to provide the press with its first truly effective self-regulatory body in the same cross-party spirit that arose from the outrage over the phone hacking scandal in July 2011. He says: “This is not, and cannot be characterized as, statutory regulation of the press.” That the judge felt the need to do this shows how hard his task has been, in the face of powerful lobbying by newspaper groups talking up a potential threat to press freedom. His recommendations for an “independent, self-regulating body” ought to – on the face of it – put those fears to rest because he stresses that independence of the government and politicians is as important as independence from newspaper owners. However, in order to ensure both that media organizations want to join the body, and that rich individuals will choose to use it rather than the courts to settle disputes, he has had to suggest an “underpinning” with law that many opponents will focus on. He says legislation will also create a duty on governments to uphold the freedom of the press, which seems an odd construction in a democracy, and unlikely to persuade those who see a slippery slope to an over interventionist state.
benton.org/node/140330 | Financial Times | Read the report | Fast Company | B&C | Politico | paidContent
Recommend this Headline
back to top
PRIME MINISTER FAILS TO BACK LEVESON
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Robert Budden, Ben Fenton, Kiran Stacey]
An enquiry into the culture and ethics of the British press called for sweeping new regulation backed by legal statute reigniting a visceral battle between proponents of free speech and defenders of the individual right to privacy. Concluding a nine-month investigation sparked by a scandal over the hacking of thousands of mobile phones by journalists, Lord Justice Leveson said the government should legislate to enshrine, for the first time, the freedom of the press in the UK. His report, which rejected an industry proposal for stronger self-regulation, excoriated the press, in particular the tabloids, and politicians for fawning on them, and divided the political establishment. While welcoming the Leveson inquiry’s outline of a system to tighten regulation of the UK’s rumbustious press, Prime Minister David Cameron refused to back the proposal to underpin a new regulatory system with law. Speaking to the House of Commons, the prime minister said he had “serious concerns and misgivings” about the proposal.
benton.org/node/140328 | Financial Times
Recommend this Headline
back to top
PRESS FREEDOM AT RISK
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] Millions of Britons were justifiably outraged over last year’s serial revelations of illegal and unethical behavior by the powerful and influential tabloid press in Britain. But the regulatory remedies proposed by an official commission of inquiry seem misplaced, excessive and potentially dangerous to Britain’s centuries-old traditions of a press free from government regulation. The commission called on Parliament to create an independent regulatory body with the authority to fine newspapers up to $1.6 million for violating its guidelines. This new organization, which newspapers could join voluntarily, would replace the largely ineffective Press Complaints Commission, run by the news industry itself, which is supposed to uphold a code of ethical journalistic practices agreed to by participating publications. Creating an independent regulatory body would require new legislation. To his credit, Prime Minister David Cameron seems opposed to proceeding in that direction. Conscientious members of all political parties should oppose it as well. Press independence is as essential a bulwark of political liberty in Britain as it is everywhere. That independence should not, and need not, be infringed upon now.
benton.org/node/140392 | New York Times
Recommend this Headline
back to top
US-EU GOOGLE PROBES
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Brent Kendall, Vanessa Mock, Thomas Catan]
The top U.S. and European antitrust officials leading separate probes of Google are set to meet in Europe next week, according to people familiar with the matter, amid indications that the two investigations may not conclude at the same time. Jon Leibowitz, chairman of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, will meet with European Union competition chief Joaquin Almunia on Dec 3 to discuss Google and a range of other cases, according to an EU official. An FTC spokeswoman confirmed Chairman Leibowitz was in Europe on several matters but declined to confirm the meeting.
benton.org/node/140411 | Wall Street Journal
Recommend this Headline
back to top