January 2014

NPD: US Smartphone Penetration Reaches 60%

Smartphone penetration and data plan usage rose to new heights in the US over the past year of 2013.

While Apple and Samsung have come to dominate the US market for smartphones, adoption of streaming music services was a key driver of growth in data plan usage, according to new market research from The NPD Group. Smartphone penetration rose from 52% in 4Q 2012 to 60% in 4Q 2013, according to NPD’s Connected Home Report. Apple iPhone ownership rose from 35% to 42% over the period, while Samsung Android smartphone ownership rose from 22% to 26%. Fewer survey respondents reported owning smartphones from HTC, Motorola or BlackBerry in 4Q in 2013. At the same time, consumers’ data usage rose from 5.5 GB to 6.6 GB per month. Among the variety of mobile broadband services contributing to growth, NPD Group analysts singled out growing adoption of streaming music services as a key driver.

Hyundai Connects With Verizon to Bring Wireless to Its US Cars

Hyundai Motor will unveil a deal with Verizon Communications to provide wireless service in its US cars and trucks, signaling the importance of the connected auto as the must-have feature for drivers.

Verizon’s service will appear on 2015 Hyundai models, starting with the Genesis sedan arriving in showrooms in May 2014, Mark Bartolomeo, a vice president at Verizon Enterprise Solutions, said in an interview. Initially, cars will use 3G wireless service and eventually will feature faster 4G technology. The Verizon service will also appear in Kia vehicles, Seoul, South Korea-based Hyundai’s corporate sibling. Automakers are rushing to link their models to the Internet. In-car technology is the top selling point for 39 percent of auto buyers today, eclipsing performance measures such as horsepower, Accenture has said. General Motors, the biggest US automaker, was one of several carmakers to unveil similar deals, when it announced a pact with AT&T. to provide 4G LTE wireless service in its Chevrolet models.

Districts Get Creative to Build Faster Internet Connections

Desperate for access to high-speed fiber-optic cable that can meet their demands for bandwidth, and frustrated with the ways in which federal regulations and large telecommunications companies often get in the way, some districts are getting creative.

Take the 5,000-student Butte district in southwestern Montana. It recently initiated a public-private partnership to build a brand-new fiber network after its plans for using technology were thwarted time and again. But over the past decade, Butte Superintendent Judy Jonart said, a lack of viable on-the-ground options has left Butte, like thousands of other school districts, struggling with Internet connections far too slow to take advantage of the digital revolution in K-12 education. “We had to do it ourselves," she said. "We didn't have any other choice." Many districts have also struggled to establish internal fiber connections among all of their schools. Experts say changing those realities is the surest way to realize President Barack Obama's goal of bringing high-speed Internet connections to nearly every school within five years. But because installing fiber-optic cable entails significant upfront costs, large telecommunications companies have declined to build out such networks in many rural and remote sections of the country, leaving districts such as Butte with few existing options to tap. This spring, the Federal Communications Commission is expected to vote on revisions to the E-rate program, the culmination of a long-awaited overhaul. It remains unclear if and how the provisions related to fiber-optic cable will change. In the meantime, districts from Montana to Virginia to New York have become increasingly proactive in finding ways to connect to fiber despite the challenges.

Half of Americans heard ‘nothing at all’ about the president’s NSA speech

Public opinion polling released by the Pew Research Center shows a majority of Americans disapprove of "the government's collection of telephone and Internet data as part of anti-terrorism efforts."

Forty percent of those surveyed approved of the government's actions, down from 48 percent when leaks from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed details of the program in June 2013. But that disapproval doesn't seem to indicate that reforming NSA surveillance is high on the agenda of everyone. In fact, the same Pew poll showed that half of Americans had heard "nothing at all" about the president's NSA speech. So even though only 21 percent of those who had heard about the changes announced in the speech thought they would increase privacy, many Americans were entirely unaware of what those changes were or were able to make informed decisions about their possible privacy implications.

Verizon transparency report reveals 320,000 data requests in 2013

Verizon says federal, state and local authorities asked it to hand over user data 321,545 times in 2013, in a report it vowed to produce following the National Security Agency revelations made by former contractor Edward Snowden.

The vast majority of requests, about 164,000, came from law enforcement subpoenas, followed by about 71,000 court orders. In 2013, the company fielded 7,800 requests for real-time information about a person's outbound and inbound calls — but of those, only about 1,500 were actual wiretap requests leading to the surveillance of a call's content. The report also shows a growing government appetite for location data. In 2013, the company saw 35,000 requests for such information. Some 3,200 constituted "tower dumps," or information on all the calls logged by a cell tower within a certain time frame. This information can be used to track a suspect's movements and behavior. According to a congressional probe, law enforcement agencies made 9,000 tower dump requests in 2013 -- meaning Verizon was the recipient of more than a third of them.

Sen Leahy: NSA surveillance ‘not making us safer’

Sen Patrick Leahy (D-VT) warned about the government’s collection of massive quantities about data about American citizens.

During a panel discussion titled “The Big Brother Problem" at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Sen Leahy said government officials “don’t make ourselves safer by wiretapping or investigating every single person.” “In the United States, which should be one of the freest countries to express yourself, we are collecting far too much information,” the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman said. “It is not making us safer.” Sen Leahy also compared the dangers posed by the National Security Agency’s (NSA) collection of information to abuses conducted by former longtime FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover or the Nixon administration during the Watergate scandal. “Just because we can do it in the United States doesn’t mean we should,” he told the panel. “I don’t think it makes us safer any more than the horrible excesses of Watergate and J. Edgar Hoover and all made us safer. It made us less safe.”

Microsoft to shield foreign users’ data

Microsoft will allow foreign customers to have their personal data stored on servers outside the US, breaking ranks with other big technology groups that until now have shown a united front in response to the American surveillance scandal.

Brad Smith, general counsel of Microsoft, said that although many tech companies were opposed to the idea, it had become necessary following leaks that showed the US National Security Agency had been monitoring the data of foreign citizens from Brazil to across the European Union. “People should have the ability to know whether their data are being subjected to the laws and access of governments in some other country and should have the ability to make an informed choice of where their data resides,” he said. Smith added that customers could choose where to store their data from a variety of existing Microsoft data centers. For example, a European client could choose to have their data stored in the group’s Irish data center.

The Buck Stops at the FCC

[Commentary] Since the DC Court threw out the Federal Communications Commission’s Open Internet rules last week, “network neutrality” is a glaring problem that demands prompt action. The good news is that the solution is pretty simple. It doesn’t require a new telecommunications statute replete with time-consuming years of legislative horse-trading and special interest lobbying. All it requires is an FCC big enough to own up to its previous mistakes and courageous enough to put our communications future back on track. The solution: reclassify broadband as “telecommunications” under Title II of the Communications Act. The time for action is now. Soon a coalition of citizens will deliver petitions to the FCC calling on the agency to take the obvious step of reclassifying broadband to protect consumers, innovation, and online free speech. Hundreds of thousands of everyday people from across the land have already signed on, and there is still time to add your name. Do it today -- then ask your friends to do the same.

Alliance for Community Media (ACM) and the National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture (NAMAC)
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 to Friday, August 8, 2014
Philadelphia, PA