Benton RSS Feed
[Commentary] The recently released Federal Communications Commission report on “The Information Needs of Communities” focuses a good deal of attention on increasing transparency by government and by broadcasters, who get to use the public airwaves for free.
Indeed, the FCC recommended that “disclosure should be a major pillar of FCC media policy.” The FCC has long recognized that providing communities with locally responsive programming is a “bedrock” obligation of every broadcaster. But to hold broadcasters accountable to this promise both citizens and the FCC need data about how broadcasters claim they are serving local communities. It’s clear from the report that the FCC recognizes that information equals power, and that citizens need more information to judge whether broadcasters are meeting their obligations to serve the public good. Why, then, did we blast the FCC’s recommendations around “enhanced disclosure”? Unfortunately, when it comes to this essential information we worry that the report has taken us one step forward and two steps back.
Debating Disclosure and Transparency in the FCC Future of Media Report
TechFreedom, a Washington (DC)-based think tank, assembled a panel of law professors gathered at the Capitol to discuss search engine bias and recent antitrust cases involving Google.
The recently-established conservative policy group moved the event to the Capitol building to make it more accessible for Senate staffers and private businessmen to attend. Each of the members of the panel came out largely against heavy antitrust regulation of search engines, particularly Google, due to their skepticism of whether fears of search engine bias were warranted. Search engine bias is when a search engine company promotes certain content over other content at the expense of competition. “Google is a source of a significant amount of traffic, but it is possible for new sites to be discovered and to turn into very large things whether Google promotes them or not,” said panelist James Grimmelman, a professor at New York Law School.
TechFreedom Panel Criticizes Search Engine Bias Claims
[Commentary] The National Broadband Plan won’t do jack until more folks in Wunderland acknowledge and aggressively address one stark truth – broadband competition is mostly a myth, expensively maintained through lobbyists, think tanks and easily-influenced politicians.
Until we get meaningful competition, a significant part – though mercifully not all – of Wunderland’s policies will result in dabbling around the edges rather than a meaningful advancement of broadband in the US. More people in Wunderland have to grab this bull by the horns, or some other vital area, and kick it in the butt. People need to take a two-by-four and beat back these attempts to undermine and circumvent programs that fund broadband efforts that introduce much needed competition. Let’s see some profiles in courage and toss this AT&T/T-Mobile merger out the back door. Encourage (incentivize) companies like Google and Corning to partner with communities to put fiber infrastructure in place. If you’re going to do more than just pretend to reform USF, take that $4 billion that comes directly out of taxpayers’ pockets and put it into communities to solicit and fund the best solutions they can find someone willing to provide. Either we get serious about competition or we stop pretending we’re serious about broadband.
Broadband Adventures in Wunderland: The (Expensive) Myth of Competition
The Administration announced a new initiative – SelectUSA – the first-ever government-wide program to aggressively pursue and win new business investment in the United States by both domestic and foreign companies.
SelectUSA, established by Executive Order of the President, will leverage existing resources of the federal government to ramp up promotion of the US as a prime investment destination to create jobs at home and to keep jobs from going overseas. We will be working with governors, mayors and legislative leaders around the country, who are trying to attract business investment. We will also be a trouble shooter for those dealing with red tape and federal hurdles to bringing or keeping business operations and investment in their communities. Coordinated by the Commerce Department, with expert personnel in nearly 80 countries promoting American exports and investment opportunities, SelectUSA will lead the federal effort to address business investment attraction and retention issues, both logistical and policy related, in the US. This new initiative will target three types of firms: foreign firms looking to expand, domestic firms looking to expand, and foreign and domestic firms looking to reorganize or return their operations to the United States.
Bringing and Keeping Business Investment in America White House (read the Executive Order)
[Commentary] We’re never going to truly connect this country if the focus of our collective broadband deployment work is to repeat erroneous claims about the number of options Americans have for broadband providers. The policies that support the current duopoly and monopoly business structure in broadband are crippling our rural communities but we won’t see forward movement on broadband competition (and therefore access, price and service) if we can’t even get the baseline data right.
The National Broadband Map’s Rural Fairy Tale
[Commentary] Let's not dismiss too quickly the federal government's potential role in promoting good news coverage.
Here are 10 steps that the US government could take that would significantly help entrepreneurs trying expand the news coverage of their local communities. And none of them involve direct subsidies or payments to the news industry. 1) Protect network neutrality. 2) Expand broadband coverage. 3) Digitize public records and put them online in open formats. 4) Pass a national shield law, with explicit protection for online publishers. 5) Regulate electronic transaction fees. 6) Revisit the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). 7) Ditch the Federal Trade Commission's "blogger endorsement" rule. 8) Model zoning reform to make it easier to run a business from your home. 9) Remove payroll tax cap and reduce rate. 10) National health care.
10 things the US government can do to help digital news entrepreneurs
While consumers are trained to look for tell-tale signs of a phishing attack on the desktop, spotting a scam from a mobile e-mail program or browser can be a lot more difficult. It’s often hard to tell where a link will take you before clicking and there is no “green bar” to tell you that a site is indeed who it purports to be. Lookout Mobile Security, a software company that specializes on smartphone security, is announcing its effort to make browsing on mobile devices a little safer. The new “safe browsing” feature works by checking all links against its cloud-based database, including those within text messages, Facebook and e-mail messages and offering a warning when users click on a link suspected of being a scam. The company began developing the feature as a proof of concept back in February and now it is being added as part of Lookout’s premium paid service.
Lookout Inks Deal With Sprint, Launches Safe Browsing Service
Following a public comment period, the Federal Trade Commission finalized the orders in two cases settling charges that Ceridian Corporation and Lookout Services, Inc. claimed they would take reasonable measures to secure the consumer data they maintained, but failed to do so. The final orders require the companies to implement a comprehensive information security program and obtain independent, third-party security audits every other year for 20 years.
FTC: Ceridian, Lookout Services Failed to Protect Consumers’ Personal Information
With all the focus on broadband at the Federal Communications Commission, it's easy to forget that the regulator's quadrennial review of its media ownership rules, originally scheduled for 2010, is overdue.
Some progress was made, though, as the FCC released five of the nine studies it ordered as part of the review of the current rules. The commission is still waiting for an additional four studies and will also conduct two studies internally. Once comments are in for all the studies, it will open up the process and decide whether to change the rules or keep them as is. The big question, though, is when that will happen, and whether the FCC will finally be able to break through the morass that its media ownership rules have become over the past decade. Some of the rules, such as one that puts limits on the ability of companies to own both a newspaper and a broadcast outlet in the same market, are still tied up in the courts. It won't surprise anyone in Washington if it takes until fall, or even longer, before the FCC is able to review all the studies, make a decision, and open up the rule-making process.
FCC Finally Making Some Progress on Media Ownership Rules
Subcommittee on Communications and Technology
House Commerce Committee
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
10:30 a.m.
http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=8713
The subcommittee will consider how the Federal Communications Commission conducts the public’s business. The hearing will focus on how to codify best practices to ensure consistency from issue to issue and from one commission to the next.
Witness List
The Hon. John Sununu
Honorary Co-Chair
Broadband for America
Kathleen Abernathy
Chief Legal Officer and Executive Vice President
Frontier Communications
Mark Cooper
Research Director
Consumer Federation of America
Ronald Levin
William R. Orthwein Distinguished Professor of Law
Washington University School of Law
Randolph J. May
President
Free State Foundation
Brad Ramsay
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners