September 2014

FCC Announces the Approval of Google's TV Bands Database System for Operation

The Federal Communications Commission’s Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) announces that it has granted approval for Google to operate its “TV bands database system” with new procedures for registration of certain protected facilities. The Google database system’s new registration procedures, which were developed by Google itself, replace that database system’s current reliance on the procedures for registering protected facilities of another TVWS database system.

Chairman Wheeler's Response to Senator Leahy Regarding Open Internet Outreach

In August, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) wrote a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler commending the FCC’s announcement that it will hold a series of public roundtables to discuss approaches to protecting an open Internet. But he asked Chairman Wheeler to hold additional meetings outside of Washington (DC). Holding roundtables across the country will help ensure that Americans have a meaningful opportunity to participate. On August 27, Chairman Wheeler wrote back to Chairman Leahy outlining the FCC’s outreach efforts around the open Internet.

Chairman Wheeler's Response to Rep. Eshoo Regarding GAO Report on Data Caps

In late July 2014, Rep Anna Eshoo (D-CA) wrote to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler to share the preliminary findings of a Government Accountability Office study on “usage-based” broadband pricing, referred to many as data caps. Rep Eshoo wrote that such pricing is threat to the free and open Internet and she asked Chairman Wheeler to consider GAO’s findings as the FCC considers new network neutrality rules.

On August 27, Chairman Wheeler wrote back to Rep Eshoo promising hat the GAO data would be made part of the record. He said, “I am concerned about usage-based practices that affect the speeds and service that customers receive. I am deeply troubled when I hear reports of providers slowing down speeds for selected customers under the guise of network management.”

Younger Americans and Public Libraries

Younger Americans -- those ages 16-29 -- especially fascinate researchers and organizations because of their advanced technology habits, their racial and ethnic diversity, their looser relationships to institutions such as political parties and organized religion, and the ways in which their social attitudes differ from their elders. This report pulls together several years of research into the role of libraries in the lives of Americans and their communities with a special focus on Millennials, a key stakeholder group affecting the future of communities, libraries, book publishers and media makers of all kinds, as well as the tone of the broader culture.

Following are some of the noteworthy insights from this research.

  • There are actually three different “generations” of younger Americans with distinct book reading habits, library usage patterns, and attitudes about libraries.
  • Millennials’ lives are full of technology, but they are more likely than their elders to say that important information is not available on the Internet.
  • Millennials are quite similar to their elders when it comes to the amount of book reading they do, but young adults are more likely to have read a book in the past 12 months.
  • The community and general media-use activities of younger adults are different from older adults.
  • As a group, Millennials are as likely as older adults to have used a library in the past 12 months, and more likely to have used a library website.
  • As with the general population, most younger Americans know where their local library is, but many say they are unfamiliar with all the services it may offer.

Net Neutrality, Civil Rights, and Big Telecom Dollars

[Commentary] David Honig is the man behind the curtain when it comes to civil rights organizations lining up behind telecom-friendly positions. Honig, and the organizations he has organized, are again advocating for fast and slow lanes on the Internet, a position that puts them in line with the interest of the large Internet Service Providers (ISPs), and in opposition to the communities they claim to serve.

While most of you have probably never heard of Honig, there is no more significant player in DC when it comes to telecom policy and the major civil rights organizations in this country. And Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler, who is leading the FCC in determining the fate of the Internet, has treated Honig and his organization as legitimate. As reporters recently began calling out the connections between his organization, Minority Media and Telecommunications Council (MMTC), civil rights groups, the telecom money they all receive, and their surprising policy positions, Honig responded by calling the reporting outrageous, insulting, and racist -- calling those pointing out the relationships a "digital lynch mob." It is to shine a light on the greater dynamics in play around the deployment of our civil rights organizations in support of a corporate agenda that is not in line with the interests of our community.

Google silent on support for group opposing net neutrality and muni broadband

Common Cause and more than 50 other advocacy groups called on Google to end its affiliation with the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a group that has pushed state laws limiting the rights of cities and towns to create community-owned broadband networks.

ALEC also opposes network neutrality rules that Google used to be a staunch supporter of and urged the Federal Communications Commission to quickly approve Comcast’s purchase of Time Warner Cable without imposing any regulatory conditions on the merger. In a letter to Google’s top executives, Common Cause et al wrote that “Over the last year, hundreds of thousands of Americans have signed petitions asking Google to end its ALEC membership because of their concerns about the harmful role ALEC has played in our democratic process… The public knows that the ALEC operation -- which brings state legislators and corporate lobbyists behind closed doors to discuss proposed legislation and share lavish dinners -- threatens our democracy. The public is asking Google to stop participating in this scheme.”

[Sept 5]

On Facebook, Nobody Knows You’re a Voter. Well, Almost Nobody.

Your Facebook profile doesn’t have boxes to check which political party you belong to or whether you voted in the last election. But political organizations who already know that can now deliver Facebook ads to fit your political preferences.

At least two statewide campaigns during the past year have used the new tool, “Custom Managed Audiences,” to reach Facebook users who are registered voters or political supporters. Linking the two isolated sets of data and teasing out information on voter preferences and opinions is a new front in microtargeting. Even smaller campaigns could use the technique to sway small but crucial sets of voters with very specific messages. Facebook’s most notable achievement may be that it makes some of the sophisticated approaches used during the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns affordable to other kinds of political contests.

Here’s one reason for why the cable bundle offers so many channels you don’t want

Why do cable subscribers end up with so many channels they have no interest in watching? Blame ESPN, says a small Cedar Falls (IA) cable provider.

Recently, the municipally-owned Cedar Falls Utilities renewed a long-term contract to broadcast Disney’s ESPN channels to its town of 40,000 residents. But this time, it said it was also forced to take on two Disney-owned channels it didn’t want -- SEC Network and Fusion. It’s deals like this that result in bloated cable bundles of hundreds of channels few people ever watch, CFU said. For customers who routinely ask: Why can't I pick channels like a la carte items off a menu? "Now you know," wrote Betty Zeman, a marketing manager at Cedar Falls Utilities.

FCC's Wheeler: 'Redskins' Name Is Offensive, Should Go

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler says he thinks the "Redskins" name for Washington's NFL team is offensive and should be changed, but thinks public pressure is the best vehicle for that exit. "I don't use the term personally and I think it is offensive and derogatory," said Chairman Wheeler. "I am a Civil War buff," he pointed out, "and there were a lot of terms that were appropriate at that time that aren't appropriate anymore."